TheBlaze.Com


Just when one thinks the barbarism could not reach greater depths of despair, a revelation emerges that even health care volunteers are not safe in lands controlled by Islamic extremists. Thus far, according to reports in the Associated Press and Reuters, nine...

he mother and uncle of a three-year-old boy named ‘Jihad’ appeared in a French court for sending him to school in a top bearing the words “I am a bomb”. The T-shirt also had the words “Jihad, born on September 11″ emblazoned on the back when he turned up at his nursery school.

Far from being the lock-step GOP ground troop some in the media have suggested it is, the tea-party movement includes people of many different ideologies … but this element is most unusual.

KleinOnline has discovered a Muslim activist organization that claims to be working from within the tea party to counter the movement’s “Islamophobia.”

Fox News


A 32-year-old Iranian who is a U.S. citizen and a Christian convert has been imprisoned without notice of any formal charges while visiting his family in Iran, according to his wife and attorneys in the U.S., who are now hoping that a media campaign will help set him...

In a short, 16-page opinion, an Oklahoma federal judge ruled late on December 13th that the City of Tulsa and two of its senior police officials, Chief of Police Chuck Jordan and Deputy Chief of Police Daryl Webster, did not violate the constitutional rights of Captain Paul Fields, a Tulsa Police officer who was summarily punished for refusing to attend a mandated Islamic proselytizing event held at a local mosque. Despite the fact that the federal judge was required to view the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn from that evidence in favor of Captain Fields before dismissing his constitutional claims, the judge concluded that “no reasonable jury could find Fields was personally ordered to attend” the Islamic event “because the directive at issue permitted him to assign others to attend rather than attend himself.” By doing so, the judge avoided addressing a central issue in this case, stating, “The issue of whether a directive requiring his personal attendance at the event would have violated his First Amendment rights need not be decided here.”